From Tranquillity to Agitation: Remedies Using the Imagination and the Passions in Early Modern Thought

From Tranquillity to Agitation: Remedies Using the Imagination and the Passions in Early Modern Thought Alexandra Ileana BACALU* Abstract: My concern in this paper is to contribute to the recovery of the therapeutic dimension of the early modern notion of imagination, which demands further interrogation despite the increased scholarly attention of recent years, by looking […]

Read More

Redeeming Enthusiasm: Enthusiasm and Reason in Shaftesbury’s The Moralists

Redeeming Enthusiasm: Enthusiasm and Reason in Shaftesbury’s The Moralists Francesca di POPPA* Abstract: In this paper, I will examine Shaftesbury‟s prima facie ambivalent attitude towards demonstrative reason, and its role in his discussion of “reasonable enthusiasm” in The Moralists. I will show that such attitude is heavily influenced by Epictetus, with whom Shaftesbury shares several […]

Read More

Inherence of False Beliefs in Spinoza’s Ethics

Inherence of False Beliefs in Spinoza’s Ethics Olivér István TÓTH* Abstract: In this paper I argue, based on a comparison of Spinoza‟s and Descartes‟s discussion of error, that beliefs are affirmations of the content of imagination that is not false in itself, only in relation to the object. This interpretation is an improvement both on […]

Read More

The Conatus of the Body in Spinoza’s Physics

The Conatus of the Body in Spinoza’s Physics Sean WINKLER* Abstract: In Part 3 of his Ethics, Baruch Spinoza identifies the conatus of the mind as „will‟ and of the mind and body together as „appetite‟/„desire,‟ but he does not identify the conatus of the body. This omission is curious, given that he describes „motion-and-rest‟ […]

Read More

Spinoza on Conatus, Inertia, and the Impossibility of Self-Destruction

Spinoza on Conatus, Inertia, and the Impossibility of Self-Destruction Filip BUYSE* Abstract: Spinoza (1632-1677) writes in the fourth proposition of the third part of his masterpiece, the Ethics (1677), the bold statement that self-destruction is impossible. This view seems to be very hard to understand given the fact that in our western world we have […]

Read More

Revitalizing Kuhn’s Philosophies of Science

Revitalizing Kuhn’s Philosophies of Science Laura GEORGESCU* In 2005, James Marcum published Thomas Kuhn’s Revolution: An Historical Philosophy of Science. That earlier book aimed to show that Kuhn was a ―a major contributor to the historiographic revolution in the mid-twentieth century,‖ a revolution that influenced ―the very understanding of science itself.‖1 In Thomas Kuhn’s Revolutions: […]

Read More

Spinoza and Stoicism

Spinoza and Stoicism Daniel COLLETTE* It is only recently that modern day scholarship has begun to appreciate and investigate Spinoza‘s affinities with the Stoics. Jon Miller‘s Spinoza and the Stoics is a welcomed contribution to philosophical literature as the first book-length study to undertake a full comparison between the two schools of thought. Although his […]

Read More

Does Sensibility Have an Historical Context?

Does Sensibility Have an Historical Context? Michael DECKARD* When a special issue of an intellectual history journal is dedicated to sensibility, one of the first questions asked is whether sensibility is particularly connected to a certain historical context. Isn‟t the nature of sensibility something beyond time and not entirely situated within early modernity? There are […]

Read More